Skip to main content

Research Papers

Featured

When Companies Forget Who They Are

The Work of Refounding

Research Paper By: Jon Iwata
November 2025

Summary

When companies experience organizational drift (forgetting who they are), conventional turnaround tools—restructuring, process fixes, portfolio shifts—often prove insufficient. Refounding guides leaders to rediscover and reinterpret the enduring character encoded in an organization’s formative years. It is a research-backed path for renewing purpose, culture, and strategy to create durable long-term value in a volatile environment.

Additional Papers

When Silence is Golden:
The Risks of Corporate Activism for Employee and Consumer Response

White Paper By: Margaret Gorlin, Nirajana Mishra, Jennie Liu and Nathan Novemsky
April 2024

Abstract

Increasingly, consumers and employees say they want companies to take action on social issues. However, corporate activism - taking a public stance on socio-political issues – can provoke significant backlash and polarization, leaving companies uncertain when activism supports or hinders organizational goals. This research, conducted in Spring 2024, examines stakeholder responses through five studies involving over 9,500 liberal and conservative participants.

Through hypothetical employee and consumer scenarios, the findings reveal that corporate stances on polarizing issues consistently generate stronger negative reactions from opponents than positive support from advocates, resulting in net negative impact on stakeholder engagement. While remaining silent often proves beneficial, companies with a history of activism face reduced stakeholder interest when choosing not to engage on similar issues. Additionally, attempts to justify corporate positions - whether through appeals to customer preferences, employee values, or company history - failed to significantly mitigate opposition.

These results indicate that optimal approaches vary based on stakeholder composition. Organizations with ideologically aligned stakeholders may have greater latitude for activism, while those with diverse stakeholder bases benefit from carefully tracking issue polarization and maintaining consistency with past patterns of engagement.