Responding to "One Walmart's Low Wages Could Cost Taxpayers $900,000 Per Year, House Dems Find" in the Huffington Post, Senior Associate Dean David Bach noted, "Walmart is rightfully held up in strategy classes as an example of 'cost leadership' but there is a question whether society pays a high price for Walmart's low prices in terms of externalities. Healthcare costs borne by the public are Exhibit A in this respect."
Are U.S. investors missing out in Africa? During a summit marking the 50th anniversary of the African Union, Secretary of State John Kerry urged U.S. businesses to invest in Africa. While acknowledging stability and security issues on the continent, he noted that Russia, Brazil, and China are increasingly important players in the growing economies there. More from NPR.
Donald Gips '89, former U.S. ambassador to South Africa, made a similar point in conversation with Yale Insights. "The risks are large," he said, "but the opportunities are huge and they need investment." Beyond the chance for significant returns, Gips said that engagement by U.S. investors in Africa can drive good business practices, transparency, and reduced corruption there.
Who should pay for government? In 1952, the corporate tax provided 32% of federal tax revenue; today the number is at 8.9%. The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations is currently looking at the tactics that Apple uses to minimize its tax bill. More from Felix Salmon of Reuters.
The U.S. faces deep challenges in its retirement system, including projected shortfalls in Social Security and a $1 trillion dollar gap in public pension programs.
A recent article in the New York Times looked at how other countries’ retirement systems might provide tips for strengthening the U.S. system. However, the variation in retirement systems from country to country can also be seen as a reflection of cultural differences which make it hard to import ideas.
Have consumer expectations of engagement with brands changed the ways companies view CMOs? Ad Age reports that CMO tenure is 46 months, double what it was seven years ago.
Professor Ravi Dhar commented: "Changes in C-suite tenures is an important early indicator of the value and importance of marketing in overall business strategy."
Responding to "Fed Zeroes In on Vulnerability to Rate Rise" in the Wall Street Journal, Professor James Choi noted: It seems intuitive that locking in a fixed stream of interest income (or payments) for a long time is a risk-reducing move, but this article shows that long-maturity fixed-rate debt actually exposes you to interest rate risk unless the other side of your balance sheet has a similarly long cash flow duration.
From Professor James Choi: For years, I have taught students that earnings per share is a highly flawed metric that is vulnerable to manipulation, and this article highlights one manifestation of its flaws. Responding to "As Companies Step Up Buybacks, Executives Benefit, Too" in the Wall Street Journal.
Berkeley economist Daniel McFadden, who won the Nobel Prize for his work analyzing choice, proposes a new "science of pleasure" that will shed greater light on how consumers make decisions. In a working paper, he writes that our understanding of social networks as well as research from cognitive psychology, anthropology, evolutionary biology, and neurology should all play into our understanding of the economics of choice.
For more see:
Yale psychologist Paul Bloom on "Why do we like what we like?"
Our issue devoted to behavioral research.
An economist's take on happiness research.
Corporate investment is at its lowest point since the Great Depression, while profits have soared to record levels. It seems like an unsustainable dynamic. A post at FTAlphaville tries to understand how this could happen and what it means for the economy as a whole.
One result of falling investments and rising profits is that companies are sitting on mountains of cash. A recent post at DealBook details some of the factors behind Apple's decisions about what to do with enough cash to "buy every office building and retail space in New York."
From Professor Ahmed Mushfiq Mobarak: Intellectual property protection is important for developing countries if they want to attract innovative businesses from abroad, or want to encourage domestic innovation. Protecting the rights of innovators may come at a human cost, since it may make the innovative output, such as essential medicines, beyond the financial reach of many consumers. Countries may also find it optimal to choose a strategy of adapting existing technologies developed abroad rather than innovate and create new ones at home. Developing countries' decisions on how stringently to protect intellectual property therefore has important economic and human rights implications and tradeoffs.
Responding to “Why Chemotherapy That Costs $70,000 in the U.S. Costs $2,500 in India” by Thomas Bollyky writing in the Atlantic.